Have each executive make the call before class.

Executives build a position independently in the simulator and real company cases, then bring their own calls into the room. Faculty use the methods and historical benchmarks to structure the live debate.

Designed for: Executive education and faculty teams

Executive classesBoard discussionsLeadership intensives

Solve one case together

01

One room for one session: pick a case and a format, everyone sends a written call, and you open the results: how the group split and why. A second session with the same group, a few weeks later, shows whether it moved.

Create a case room

Take the course together

02

Your people take the Business Judgement Course over 3, 6 or 8 weeks, between a first and a final decision on real cases. decidenda sends the invitations and reminders; the report compares the two decisions.

See the course plan

Move the discussion from opinions to evidence.

A position to defend

01

Every case question asks the participant to make and explain a call.

Private feedback

02

The participant sees a review of their own reasoning in their account.

A useful reveal

03

The historical decision adds evidence without becoming an answer key.

How the course together runs.

  1. 01

    Public invitation

    Participants can inspect the invitation and programme before signing in.

  2. 02

    The first decision, alone

    Everyone makes the first decision independently before the learning sequence.

    First cohort pattern

  3. 03

    One decision per question

    Each participant argues the case’s decision in writing and gets a private review on five steps of reasoning.

  4. 04

    Cohort report

    Compare the first and final decisions once at least five people have made both.

    Evidence without ranking

The privacy boundary

  • In a room, the person leading reads each answer with its name, unless the room allows anonymous ones
  • Other participants never see a name or a score
  • Owners see participation states
  • Group results start at five people who made both decisions

Common questions.

Are participant answers private?
From each other, yes: participants never open each other’s answers. In a case room the people leading it read every answer with its review and the participant’s name, unless the room allows anonymous answers, and the invitation says which before anyone joins. In the course together, nobody reads a participant’s decisions.
Is the historical decision the correct answer?
No. It is a benchmark for discussion. The review scores the reasoning shown, not agreement with the historical choice.

Choose a multiplayer format for Executive education

We will suggest a one-case room or a prepared cohort programme.